Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone

Djatcho Siefu Donald

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19

| Peer-Reviewed

Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone

Djatcho Siefu Donald

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6)

Received: 20 September 2021 Accepted: 30 November 2021 Published: 24 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to demonstrate that it is possible to promote agricultural Territorial Entrepreneurship (TE) capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC. To this end, two specific objectives guided this research (1) To prove that the territories (T) where PIDMA Agricultural Cooperative Partners (Agricultural Investment and Market Development Project) are prepared for an agricultural TE; (2) To demonstrate that there is a significant link between PIDMA and TE capitalising CEMAC opportunities. Using the hypothetical-deductive method, base on case study (Bangangte and Ngoulemakong Municipality), the institutional diagnostic (of PIDMA), and the documentaries analysis that including economic policies and activities reports of economic development; the research established the unpreparedness of the territories and the communication between PIDMA and TE due to the inadequacy of the political institutional context. This context is marked by a policy of industrialisation, based on poles (10 regional poles) which in fact do not correspond to areas of proximity, territorial identity, community self-promotion and functional specialisation. The research has also shown that the PIDMA has the statutory, organic, cognitive and material to promote an agribusiness that conquers the community and the international markets. Unfortunately, its strategy is ineffective because of: its development objective, which is not the development of territories (T), but rather the completeness of value chain; the failure to observe the principles of community development, in particular: transversally, integration of development action, the development of local partnership and the animation of territories. Given its capacities, age-old traditional institutions and territorial identity favourable to the community development in the territory, and the modest adjustment required for its intervention strategy, it is possible for the PIDMA to promote territorial agricultural entrepreneurship, capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC.

Published in	Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19
Page(s)	333-347
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Territorial Entrepreneurship, Regional Integration, Agricultural Markets, Value Chains

References

[1]	Brandt Jason (1991), «The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test: Development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms», April 1991 Clinical Neuropsychologist 5 (2): 125-142 DOI: 10.1080/13854049108403297.
[2]	CIRAD-SAR (1996), Local Agri-food Systems, repport.
[3]	Cnuced [Unctad] (2009): The economic development in Africa To strengthen the regional economic integration for the development of Africa UNITED NATIONS, New York and Geneva, on the 21/05/2017, http://unctad.org/fr/Docs/aldcafrica2009_fr.pdf
[4]	Coissard Steven and Pecqueur Bernard (2007) «Des avantages comparatifs aux avantages différenciatifs, une approche par le territoire» débats et enjeux des différentes approches disciplinaires, XLIIIè Colloque de l’ASRDLF Grenoble and Chambéry 11-12th and 13th july 2007. [“From comparative advantages to differentiating advantages, a regional approach”: debates and challenges of different disciplinary approaches, XLIIIth ASRDLF Grenoble and Chambéry 11-12th and 13th July 2007 colloquium].
[5]	Colletis-Wahl K., Gilly J. P. and B. Pecqueur, (2001), "Territories, Development and specifie resources: what analytical framework?" Regional Studies, 35 (5), pp; 449-459.
[6]	Coppin O. (2002): “Le milieu innovateur: une approche par le système” [“The innovative environment: a system-based approach”], in Innovations, Cahiers d'économie de l'innovation N°16, 2002-2, pp. 29-50, view on the 17/05/2017, https://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=INNO_016_0029.
[7]	Courlet C., (1990), les industrialisations du tiers-monde, [industrializations of the third world] éd. Syros, Paris.
[8]	Courlet C. (2001), «Les systèmes productifs localisés: un bilan de la littérature», ["Localized productive systems: a review of the literature”] Cahiers d’économie et de sociologie rurale, n° 58-59, pp 82-103.
[9]	Djatcho Siefu. D., (2008), Gestion durable des ressources halieutiques: cas de la pêche dans les localités de Youpwé et Manoka (Douala), [Sustainable management of fishery resources: case of fishing in the localities of Youpwé and Manoka (Douala)] DEA thesis, University of Yaounde II.
[10]	Djatcho Siefu D. (2012), Territorial Governance and Industrial Development Douala, a PhD thesis April 2012, Grenoble France.
[11]	Djatcho Siefu D. (2014): Spacial and Regional Mutation in the CEMAC Zone, Course on, eLearning Program, Master PDIR 2, IPD-AC.
[12]	Eboue C., (1990), Les effets macro-économiques de la répression financière dans les PED. [The macroeconomic effects of financial repression in developing countries], Économie appliquée, tome LXIII, n”4, pp. 93- 121.
[13]	Essombe Edimo J. R. (2005) «le développement territorialisé à Douala: fondements et repérage des modalités institutionnelles d’une dynamique nouvelle» [Territorialized development in Douala: foundation and identification of institutional modalities of dynamic] in Revue Mondes en développement, No 120, vol. 30.
[14]	Essombe Edimo J. R. (2017): Course: “Nouvelles configurations spatiales de la production industrielle” [The New Spatial Configurations of Industrial Production], e-learning master II, IPD-AC, 2017.
[15]	Favreau L. (2004): “Théories et stratégies de développement au sud: itinéraire de 1960 à aujourd'hui”, [“Theories and development stratagies in the South”], in Serie de recherche No 32, CRDC, University of Quebec in Outaouais, consulted 17/07/2017, http://jupiter.uqo.ca/crdc/00_fichiers/publications/cahiers/R32.pdf.
[16]	Gilly J.P & Grossetti M., (1993), «Organisation, individus et territoires. Le cas des systèmes locaux d’innovation» [“Organization, individuals and territories. The case of local innovation systems”]. Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 3, 449-468.
[17]	Gilly, J. P., Grossetti, M. & Bes, M. P. [1992], «Systèmes socio-productifs locaux et développement technologique: le cas des activités spatiales et du génie logiciel à Toulouse», [“Local socio-productive systems and technological development: the case of space activities and software engineering in Toulouse”] Rapport PIRTTEM-CNRS, juillet.
[18]	Guigou J. L. (1978), [Inter-municipal cooperation and the new growth model] Review of Regional and Urban Economy, No. 4.
[19]	Hadjou L. (2009): “Les deux piliers de la construction territoriale: coordination des acteurs et ressources territoriales” [“The two pillars of territorial construction: coordination of actors and territorial resources”], in Développement durable et territoires [online], Varia (2004-2010), uploaded online on the 07th July 2009, view on the 09th October 2017. URL: http://developpement durable.revues.org/8208; DOI: 10.4000/developpementdurable.8208.
[20]	Ikonicoff M. (1983): “Théorie et stratégie du développement: le rôle de l'État”, [“Development theory and strategy: the role of the state”] in Revue Tiers-Monde, tome 24, No: 93, 1983. pp. 9-33; [online] view on 22/05/2017, http://www.persee.fr/doc/tiers_0040-7356_1983_num_24_93_4253
[21]	Kahn R. (2009): “La place des territoires dans la nouvelle stratégie économique européenne”, [“The place of territories in the new European economic strategy”] in Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe No: 21 Hiver 2009 PP. 20-23 [En ligne], http://opee.unistra.fr/spip.php?article190 Bulletin de L'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe.
[22]	Krugman P., (1987): “The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: Notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies”, Journal of Development Economics, pkrugman@princeton.edu) 1987, vol. 27, issue 1-2, 41-55.
[23]	Krugman, P., (1991 b), Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[24]	Krugman, P., (1991a), Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 3, 483-499.
[25]	Krugman, P., (1993), First Nature, Second Nature, and Metropolitan Location, Journal of Regional Science, 33, 2, 129-144.
[26]	Krugman, P. (1995), Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[27]	Krugman, P., (1998), What’s new about the New Economic Geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 2, 7-17.
[28]	Lopez C. And Hua A. (2012): Economic development strategies in territorial projects of sustainable development in Ile-de-France. Presentation of theorical aspects and case analysis, IAU Ile-de-France, view on the 17/05/2017, http://www.driee.iledefrance.developpementdurable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/IAU_Place_de_leconomie_dans_les_AG21_VF092012-1.pdf
[29]	Maillat D. (1996), Du district industriel au milieu innovateur: contribution à une analyse des organisations productives territorialisées, [From industrial district to innovative environment: contribution to an analysis of territorialized productive organizations], working paper n° 9, 606a. Regional Economic Research Institution.
[30]	Maillat D., (2002), “interactions entre système de production localisé: une approach e du développement régional endogène en termes de milieu innovateur”, [“interactions between localized production systems: an approach to endogenous regional development in terms of an innovative environment”] in villes et croissances, théories, modèles, perspectives Anthropos.
[31]	Maillat D., And Lecoq B, (1992), “New Technologies and Transformation of régional Structures in Europe: The role of the Milieu “, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4, 1-20.
[32]	Mollard A., (2001), “Qualité et développement territorial: une grille d'analyse théorique à partir de la rente”, [“Quality and territorial development: a theoretical analysis grid based on the rent”], Économie Rurale 263 (1): 16-34 DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.2001.5240, January 2001.
[33]	Pecqueur B., (1996), Dynamiques territoriales et développement économique, [Territorial dynamics and economic development], Paris, Ed. L'Harmattan.
[34]	Pecqueur B., (2001), “Les ressources de territoires et les territoires de ressources”, [Territory resources and resource territories], Finisterra 36 (71) DOI: 10.18055/Finis1644 January 2001.
[35]	Perrin J. C. (1984), “Economie spatiale et méso-analyse”, [“Spatial economics and meso-analysis”], in Aydalot, Crise et Espace, Ed. Economica, Paris.
[36]	Perroux F. (1982), Dialogue des monopoles et des nations «équilibre» ou dynamique des unités actives?, [Dialogue between monopolies and nations "equilibrium" or dynamic of active units?, PUG.
[37]	Porter M. E., (2000), «Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy» Economic Development Quarterly, Harvard Business School 2000, vol. 14, issue 1, 15-34.
[38]	Proulx (1994a) «Une lecture de l'œuvre de Michel de Certeau: L'Invention du quotidien, paradigme de l'activité des usagers», [“A reading of the work of Michel de Certeau: The Invention of the Daily, a paradigm of user activity”] Communication, vol. 15, n^o 2, 1994a, p. 171-197.
[39]	Proulx (1994b), “Les différentes problématiques de l'usage et de l'usager”, [“The different issues of use and the user”] in Vitalis André (dir.), Médias et nouvelles technologies. Pour une sociopolitique des usages, Apogée, Rennes, 1994b, p. 149-159.
[40]	Rallet A. (1999), «L’économie de proximité», [“The economy of proximity”], Communication à l’Ecole-Chercheur, INRA, le Croisic, 8-10 décembre.
[41]	Rallet A. et Torre A. (2001), Proximité Géographique ou Proximité Organisationnelle? Une analyse spatiale des coopérations technologiques dans les réseaux localisés d’innovation, [Geographical Proximity or Organizational Proximity? A spatial analysis of technological cooperation in localized innovation networks], Economie Appliquée, LIV, 1, 147-171.
[42]	Ricardo, D. (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: John.
[43]	Smith A. (1776), Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations, [Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations], Trad. Française, vol. 2 second edition, Flammarion, Paris, 1991.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Djatcho Siefu Donald. (2021). Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone. Social Sciences, 10(6), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Djatcho Siefu Donald. Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone. Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(6), 333-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Djatcho Siefu Donald. Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone. Soc Sci. 2021;10(6):333-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19,
  author = {Djatcho Siefu Donald},
  title = {Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {333-347},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20211006.19},
  abstract = {The main objective of this research is to demonstrate that it is possible to promote agricultural Territorial Entrepreneurship (TE) capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC. To this end, two specific objectives guided this research (1) To prove that the territories (T) where PIDMA Agricultural Cooperative Partners (Agricultural Investment and Market Development Project) are prepared for an agricultural TE; (2) To demonstrate that there is a significant link between PIDMA and TE capitalising CEMAC opportunities. Using the hypothetical-deductive method, base on case study (Bangangte and Ngoulemakong Municipality), the institutional diagnostic (of PIDMA), and the documentaries analysis that including economic policies and activities reports of economic development; the research established the unpreparedness of the territories and the communication between PIDMA and TE due to the inadequacy of the political institutional context. This context is marked by a policy of industrialisation, based on poles (10 regional poles) which in fact do not correspond to areas of proximity, territorial identity, community self-promotion and functional specialisation. The research has also shown that the PIDMA has the statutory, organic, cognitive and material to promote an agribusiness that conquers the community and the international markets. Unfortunately, its strategy is ineffective because of: its development objective, which is not the development of territories (T), but rather the completeness of value chain; the failure to observe the principles of community development, in particular: transversally, integration of development action, the development of local partnership and the animation of territories. Given its capacities, age-old traditional institutions and territorial identity favourable to the community development in the territory, and the modest adjustment required for its intervention strategy, it is possible for the PIDMA to promote territorial agricultural entrepreneurship, capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone
AU  - Djatcho Siefu Donald
Y1  - 2021/12/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 333
EP  - 347
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19
AB  - The main objective of this research is to demonstrate that it is possible to promote agricultural Territorial Entrepreneurship (TE) capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC. To this end, two specific objectives guided this research (1) To prove that the territories (T) where PIDMA Agricultural Cooperative Partners (Agricultural Investment and Market Development Project) are prepared for an agricultural TE; (2) To demonstrate that there is a significant link between PIDMA and TE capitalising CEMAC opportunities. Using the hypothetical-deductive method, base on case study (Bangangte and Ngoulemakong Municipality), the institutional diagnostic (of PIDMA), and the documentaries analysis that including economic policies and activities reports of economic development; the research established the unpreparedness of the territories and the communication between PIDMA and TE due to the inadequacy of the political institutional context. This context is marked by a policy of industrialisation, based on poles (10 regional poles) which in fact do not correspond to areas of proximity, territorial identity, community self-promotion and functional specialisation. The research has also shown that the PIDMA has the statutory, organic, cognitive and material to promote an agribusiness that conquers the community and the international markets. Unfortunately, its strategy is ineffective because of: its development objective, which is not the development of territories (T), but rather the completeness of value chain; the failure to observe the principles of community development, in particular: transversally, integration of development action, the development of local partnership and the animation of territories. Given its capacities, age-old traditional institutions and territorial identity favourable to the community development in the territory, and the modest adjustment required for its intervention strategy, it is possible for the PIDMA to promote territorial agricultural entrepreneurship, capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Djatcho Siefu Donald

Department of Economics, Faculty of Social and Management Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Djatcho Siefu Donald. (2021). Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone. Social Sciences, 10(6), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Djatcho Siefu Donald. Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone. Soc. Sci. 2021, 10(6), 333-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Djatcho Siefu Donald. Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone. Soc Sci. 2021;10(6):333-347. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19,
  author = {Djatcho Siefu Donald},
  title = {Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {333-347},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20211006.19},
  abstract = {The main objective of this research is to demonstrate that it is possible to promote agricultural Territorial Entrepreneurship (TE) capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC. To this end, two specific objectives guided this research (1) To prove that the territories (T) where PIDMA Agricultural Cooperative Partners (Agricultural Investment and Market Development Project) are prepared for an agricultural TE; (2) To demonstrate that there is a significant link between PIDMA and TE capitalising CEMAC opportunities. Using the hypothetical-deductive method, base on case study (Bangangte and Ngoulemakong Municipality), the institutional diagnostic (of PIDMA), and the documentaries analysis that including economic policies and activities reports of economic development; the research established the unpreparedness of the territories and the communication between PIDMA and TE due to the inadequacy of the political institutional context. This context is marked by a policy of industrialisation, based on poles (10 regional poles) which in fact do not correspond to areas of proximity, territorial identity, community self-promotion and functional specialisation. The research has also shown that the PIDMA has the statutory, organic, cognitive and material to promote an agribusiness that conquers the community and the international markets. Unfortunately, its strategy is ineffective because of: its development objective, which is not the development of territories (T), but rather the completeness of value chain; the failure to observe the principles of community development, in particular: transversally, integration of development action, the development of local partnership and the animation of territories. Given its capacities, age-old traditional institutions and territorial identity favourable to the community development in the territory, and the modest adjustment required for its intervention strategy, it is possible for the PIDMA to promote territorial agricultural entrepreneurship, capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Agricultural Territory Entrepreneurship and Regional Integration in the CEMAC Zone
AU  - Djatcho Siefu Donald
Y1  - 2021/12/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 333
EP  - 347
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20211006.19
AB  - The main objective of this research is to demonstrate that it is possible to promote agricultural Territorial Entrepreneurship (TE) capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC. To this end, two specific objectives guided this research (1) To prove that the territories (T) where PIDMA Agricultural Cooperative Partners (Agricultural Investment and Market Development Project) are prepared for an agricultural TE; (2) To demonstrate that there is a significant link between PIDMA and TE capitalising CEMAC opportunities. Using the hypothetical-deductive method, base on case study (Bangangte and Ngoulemakong Municipality), the institutional diagnostic (of PIDMA), and the documentaries analysis that including economic policies and activities reports of economic development; the research established the unpreparedness of the territories and the communication between PIDMA and TE due to the inadequacy of the political institutional context. This context is marked by a policy of industrialisation, based on poles (10 regional poles) which in fact do not correspond to areas of proximity, territorial identity, community self-promotion and functional specialisation. The research has also shown that the PIDMA has the statutory, organic, cognitive and material to promote an agribusiness that conquers the community and the international markets. Unfortunately, its strategy is ineffective because of: its development objective, which is not the development of territories (T), but rather the completeness of value chain; the failure to observe the principles of community development, in particular: transversally, integration of development action, the development of local partnership and the animation of territories. Given its capacities, age-old traditional institutions and territorial identity favourable to the community development in the territory, and the modest adjustment required for its intervention strategy, it is possible for the PIDMA to promote territorial agricultural entrepreneurship, capitalising on the opportunities of the CEMAC.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download