Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering

Hamisi Sama; Philibert Ndunguru; Paul Nsimbila

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering

Hamisi Sama, Philibert Ndunguru, Paul Nsimbila

Published in Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Received: 19 June 2021 Accepted: 2 July 2021 Published: 7 July 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Opportunism negatively impacts relational exchange tenets in public procurement such as trust, compliance, professional values and ethics. It is manifested in behaviours such as stealing, cheating, dishonesty, and withholding information when executing competitive tendering. The problems of competitive tendering and its implications on public sector procurement have been identified as not only enormous but complex now that there is serious needs on the part of various government servants to provide poor services with little funds. However, integrity translates degree of reliability of public procurement practitioners, as bidders and all other stakeholders need to have assurance that they can rely on any information disseminated by the procurement entity, formally or informally. This study is endeavor to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between integrity on opportunism dimensions, with a special focus on behavioural aspects in public sector. Primary data were collected through self administered questionnaire to public procurement practitioners and regulators in Tanzania’s Local Government Authorities of Singida and Dodoma Regions. Data were analysed through preliminary analysis, descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis to examine effects of Integrity on Opportunism in Competitive Tendering. It is evidenced that integrity practices in competitive tendering are statistically significant and negatively correlated to opportunism. The findings will help public procurement practitioners and regulators in Local Government Authorities to take necessary steps to improve integrity so as to reduce opportunistic behaviours in competitive tendering. In overall, higher integrity is associated with higher level of competitive tendering performance.

Published in	Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12
Page(s)	155-161
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Opportunism, Integrity, Competitive Tendering, Public Procurement

References

[1]	Lodhia, S. K., and Burritt, R. L. (2004). Public sector accountability failure in an emerging economy. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
[2]	Beth, E. (2007). Integrity in public procurement: Good practice from A to Z. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
[3]	Adusei, C., and Awunyo-Vitor, D. (2015). Implementation challenges of the public procurement act by selected metropolitan, municipal and district assemblies in the Ashanti Region, Ghana. iBusiness, 7 (01), 39.
[4]	Akaninyene, O. U., and Mark, J. (2015). Effect of ethics and integrity on good public procurement system. AFRREV IJAH: An International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 4 (1), 168-176.
[5]	Khan, N. (2018). Public Procurement Fundamentals: Lessons from and for the Field. Emerald Group Publishing.
[6]	Yakovlev, A., Tkachenko, A., & Rodionova, Y. (2020). Who Is Inclined to Hide the Truth: Evidence from Public Procurement. International Journal of Public Administration, 43 (13), 1109-1120.
[7]	Kauppi, K., & Van Raaij, E. M. (2015). Opportunism and honest incompetence—seeking explanations for noncompliance in public procurement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25 (3), 953-979.
[8]	Luo, J., Meyer, J. J., & Knobbout, M. (2017, May). Reasoning about Opportunistic Propensity in Multi-agent Systems. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 203-221). Springer, Cham.
[9]	Huo, B., Ye, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). The impacts of trust and contracts on opportunism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 160-170.
[10]	Govindarajan, V. (2016). Planned opportunism. Harvard Business Review, 94 (5), 54-61.
[11]	Bovis, C. H. (2006). Developing public procurement regulation: Jurisprudence and its influence on law making. Common Market L. Rev., 43, 461.
[12]	Hunja, R. R. (2003). Obstacles to public procurement reform in developing countries. Public Procurement: The Continuing Revolution, Kluwer Law International, 13-22.
[13]	Somera, K., and Holt, M. K. (2015). Integrity in business: An evaluation of integrity across German and American culture. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6 (2) 32-36.
[14]	Banks, S. (2004). Professional integrity, social work and the ethics of distrust'. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 11 (2), 20-35.
[15]	Lingard, H., Hughes, W., and Chinyio, E. (1998). The impact of contractor selection method on transaction costs: a review. Journal of Construction Procurement, 4 (2), 89-102.
[16]	Ho, S. P., and Tsui, C. W. (2009, November). The transaction costs of Public-Private Partnerships: implications on PPP governance design. In Lead 2009 Specialty Conference: Global Governance in Project Organizations, South Lake Tahoe, CA (pp. 5-7).
[17]	Tan, L. H. J. (2013). An analysis of internal controls and procurement fraud deterrence (Doctoral dissertation, Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School).
[18]	Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., and Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 1-12.
[19]	Gaziano, T. F. (2000). The use and abuse of executive orders and other presidential directives. Tex. Rev. L. & Pol., 5, 267.
[20]	Awuor, E. O., and Muthoni, G. B. (2014). The Influence of Purchasing Maturity on Ethical Procurement in Kenya: A Survey of Procurement Professionals in Kenya.
[21]	Williams, S., & Quinot, G. (2007). Public procurement and corruption: the South African response. South African Law Journal, 124 (2), 339-363.
[22]	Williams-Elegbe, S. (2015). A comparative analysis of the Nigerian Public Procurement Act against international best practice. Journal of African Law, 59 (01), 85-98.
[23]	Osei-Afoakwa, K. (2012). What makes corruption in the public procurement process awful?. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 1 (3), 622-633.
[24]	Karthikeyan, C. (2017). A Meta Analytical Study on Leadership Integrity: A leadership Ethics Perspective. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 7 (4), 240-263.
[25]	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). OECD principles for integrity in public procurement. OECD Publishing.
[26]	Udechukwu, I. I. (2007). Integrity: The Courage to Meet the Demands of Reality. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 12 (2), 106.
[27]	Tukuta, M., and Saruchera, F. (2015). Challenges facing procurement professionals in developing economies: Unlocking value through professional international purchasing. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 9 (1), 1-9.
[28]	Tremblay, M., Martineau, J. T., and Pauchant, T. C. (2017). Managing organizational ethics in the public sector: A pluralist contingency approach as an alternative to the integrity management framework. Public Integrity, 19 (3), 219-233.
[29]	Moorman, R. H., and Grover, S. (2009). Why does leader integrity matter to followers? An uncertainty management-based explanation. International journal of leadership studies, 5 (2), 102-114.
[30]	Dimitri, N., Piga, G., and Spagnolo, G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of procurement. Cambridge University Press.
[31]	Dunn, C. P. (2009). Integrity matters. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5 (2), 102-125.
[32]	Haack, S. (2007). The integrity of science: What it means, why it matters. Contrastes: Revista International de Filosofia (Spain), 12, 5-26.
[33]	Barnard, A., Schurink, W., & De Beer, M. (2008). A conceptual framework of integrity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34 (2), 40-49.
[34]	Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[35]	Ackah, D., Agboyi, M. R., Adu–Gyamfi, L., and Enu, P. (2014). Competitive Tendering, an Effective Tool in Ensuring Value for Money in Public Sector Procurement: A Case Study at “Ahanta West District Assembly” A District in the Western Part of Ghana. Global Journal of Management Studies and Researches, 1 (4), 186-201.
[36]	Erridge, A., and McIlroy, J. (2002). Public procurement and supply management strategies. Public policy and administration, 17 (1), 52-71.
[37]	Ozkan-Tektas, O. (2014). The effects of opportunism and trust on buyer-supplier relationship: Do commitment types matter. International journal of business and social research, 4 (9), 14-26.
[38]	Das, T. K., and Teng, B. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11, 77–101.
[39]	Das, T. K., and Teng, B. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 85–116.
[40]	Heggstad, K., Frøystad, M., and Isaksen, J. (2010). The basics of integrity in procurement: A guidebook. Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway.
[41]	Mayavi, H. P. (2013). An assessment of tendering procedures in public Organization The case of college of business education (CBE) (Doctoral dissertation, Mzumbe University).
[42]	Reeves, E. (2008). The practice of contracting in public private partnerships: Transaction costs and relational contracting in the Irish schools sector. Public Administration, 86 (4), 969-986.
[43]	Ping Ho, S., Levitt, R., Tsui, C. W., and Hsu, Y. (2015). Opportunism-focused transaction cost analysis of public-private partnerships. Journal of management in engineering, 31 (6), 04015007.
[44]	Hawkins, T. G. (2007). Explaining Buyer Opportunism in Business-to-Business Relationships.
[45]	Tadelis, S., & Bajari, P. (2006). Incentives and award procedures: competitive tendering vs. negotiations in procurement. Handbook of procurement, 121, 39.
[46]	Mantzaris, E. A. (2014). Public procurement, tendering and corruption: Realities, challenges and tangible solutions.
[47]	Agerberg, J. N., and Ågren, J. (2012). Risk management in the tendering process (A survey of risk management practices within infrastructural construction). Master of Science Thesis in the Masters Programme Design and Construction Project Management, Göteborg, Sweden.
[48]	Hobbs, J. E. (1996). A transaction cost approach to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.
[49]	Priyanath, S., & Buthsala, A. (2017). Information, opportunism and business performance: A case of small businesses managed by women entrepreneurs in Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5 (11), 230-239.
[50]	Buglear, J. (2005). Quantitative Methods for Business The A-Zof QM. Burlington: Elsevier.
[51]	Collins Ochieng, O. (2019). Role Of Integrity In Enhancing Effective Procurement Practice In Kenya Bureau Of Standards. European Journal of Business and Strategic Management Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019).
[52]	Anderson, R. D., Kovacic, W. E., & Müller, A. C. (2011). Ensuring integrity and competition in public procurement markets: a dual challenge for good governance. The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform, 681, 681.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hamisi Sama, Philibert Ndunguru, Paul Nsimbila. (2021). Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering. Science Journal of Business and Management, 9(3), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hamisi Sama; Philibert Ndunguru; Paul Nsimbila. Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2021, 9(3), 155-161. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hamisi Sama, Philibert Ndunguru, Paul Nsimbila. Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering. Sci J Bus Manag. 2021;9(3):155-161. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12,
  author = {Hamisi Sama and Philibert Ndunguru and Paul Nsimbila},
  title = {Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering},
  journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {155-161},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20210903.12},
  abstract = {Opportunism negatively impacts relational exchange tenets in public procurement such as trust, compliance, professional values and ethics. It is manifested in behaviours such as stealing, cheating, dishonesty, and withholding information when executing competitive tendering. The problems of competitive tendering and its implications on public sector procurement have been identified as not only enormous but complex now that there is serious needs on the part of various government servants to provide poor services with little funds. However, integrity translates degree of reliability of public procurement practitioners, as bidders and all other stakeholders need to have assurance that they can rely on any information disseminated by the procurement entity, formally or informally. This study is endeavor to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between integrity on opportunism dimensions, with a special focus on behavioural aspects in public sector. Primary data were collected through self administered questionnaire to public procurement practitioners and regulators in Tanzania’s Local Government Authorities of Singida and Dodoma Regions. Data were analysed through preliminary analysis, descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis to examine effects of Integrity on Opportunism in Competitive Tendering. It is evidenced that integrity practices in competitive tendering are statistically significant and negatively correlated to opportunism. The findings will help public procurement practitioners and regulators in Local Government Authorities to take necessary steps to improve integrity so as to reduce opportunistic behaviours in competitive tendering. In overall, higher integrity is associated with higher level of competitive tendering performance.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering
AU  - Hamisi Sama
AU  - Philibert Ndunguru
AU  - Paul Nsimbila
Y1  - 2021/07/07
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12
T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
SP  - 155
EP  - 161
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0634
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12
AB  - Opportunism negatively impacts relational exchange tenets in public procurement such as trust, compliance, professional values and ethics. It is manifested in behaviours such as stealing, cheating, dishonesty, and withholding information when executing competitive tendering. The problems of competitive tendering and its implications on public sector procurement have been identified as not only enormous but complex now that there is serious needs on the part of various government servants to provide poor services with little funds. However, integrity translates degree of reliability of public procurement practitioners, as bidders and all other stakeholders need to have assurance that they can rely on any information disseminated by the procurement entity, formally or informally. This study is endeavor to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between integrity on opportunism dimensions, with a special focus on behavioural aspects in public sector. Primary data were collected through self administered questionnaire to public procurement practitioners and regulators in Tanzania’s Local Government Authorities of Singida and Dodoma Regions. Data were analysed through preliminary analysis, descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis to examine effects of Integrity on Opportunism in Competitive Tendering. It is evidenced that integrity practices in competitive tendering are statistically significant and negatively correlated to opportunism. The findings will help public procurement practitioners and regulators in Local Government Authorities to take necessary steps to improve integrity so as to reduce opportunistic behaviours in competitive tendering. In overall, higher integrity is associated with higher level of competitive tendering performance.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Hamisi Sama

Procurement and Supplies Department, College of Business Education, Dodoma Campus, Dodoma, Tanzania
Philibert Ndunguru

Faculty of Science and Technology, Mzumbe University, Mzumbe, Morogoro, Tanzania
Paul Nsimbila

Department of Procurement and Logistics, School of Business, Mzumbe University, Mzumbe, Morogoro, Tanzania

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hamisi Sama, Philibert Ndunguru, Paul Nsimbila. (2021). Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering. Science Journal of Business and Management, 9(3), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hamisi Sama; Philibert Ndunguru; Paul Nsimbila. Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2021, 9(3), 155-161. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hamisi Sama, Philibert Ndunguru, Paul Nsimbila. Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering. Sci J Bus Manag. 2021;9(3):155-161. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12,
  author = {Hamisi Sama and Philibert Ndunguru and Paul Nsimbila},
  title = {Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering},
  journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {155-161},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20210903.12},
  abstract = {Opportunism negatively impacts relational exchange tenets in public procurement such as trust, compliance, professional values and ethics. It is manifested in behaviours such as stealing, cheating, dishonesty, and withholding information when executing competitive tendering. The problems of competitive tendering and its implications on public sector procurement have been identified as not only enormous but complex now that there is serious needs on the part of various government servants to provide poor services with little funds. However, integrity translates degree of reliability of public procurement practitioners, as bidders and all other stakeholders need to have assurance that they can rely on any information disseminated by the procurement entity, formally or informally. This study is endeavor to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between integrity on opportunism dimensions, with a special focus on behavioural aspects in public sector. Primary data were collected through self administered questionnaire to public procurement practitioners and regulators in Tanzania’s Local Government Authorities of Singida and Dodoma Regions. Data were analysed through preliminary analysis, descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis to examine effects of Integrity on Opportunism in Competitive Tendering. It is evidenced that integrity practices in competitive tendering are statistically significant and negatively correlated to opportunism. The findings will help public procurement practitioners and regulators in Local Government Authorities to take necessary steps to improve integrity so as to reduce opportunistic behaviours in competitive tendering. In overall, higher integrity is associated with higher level of competitive tendering performance.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Antecedents of Opportunism on Integrity in Competitive Tendering
AU  - Hamisi Sama
AU  - Philibert Ndunguru
AU  - Paul Nsimbila
Y1  - 2021/07/07
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12
T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
SP  - 155
EP  - 161
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0634
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.12
AB  - Opportunism negatively impacts relational exchange tenets in public procurement such as trust, compliance, professional values and ethics. It is manifested in behaviours such as stealing, cheating, dishonesty, and withholding information when executing competitive tendering. The problems of competitive tendering and its implications on public sector procurement have been identified as not only enormous but complex now that there is serious needs on the part of various government servants to provide poor services with little funds. However, integrity translates degree of reliability of public procurement practitioners, as bidders and all other stakeholders need to have assurance that they can rely on any information disseminated by the procurement entity, formally or informally. This study is endeavor to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between integrity on opportunism dimensions, with a special focus on behavioural aspects in public sector. Primary data were collected through self administered questionnaire to public procurement practitioners and regulators in Tanzania’s Local Government Authorities of Singida and Dodoma Regions. Data were analysed through preliminary analysis, descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis to examine effects of Integrity on Opportunism in Competitive Tendering. It is evidenced that integrity practices in competitive tendering are statistically significant and negatively correlated to opportunism. The findings will help public procurement practitioners and regulators in Local Government Authorities to take necessary steps to improve integrity so as to reduce opportunistic behaviours in competitive tendering. In overall, higher integrity is associated with higher level of competitive tendering performance.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download