This study attempts to evaluate the environmental impact of rice processing system (raw materials acquisition, paddy processing, packaging, transportation and by-product recycle) with the application of GaBi6.0 software and CML2001-Jan.2016 model, primary data were collected from an agricultural group in the northeast China. The results that the life cycle total environmental impact is 4.35×10-6, and Global Warming Potential causes the largest damage on environment with the contribution of 66.58% of the total environmental impact potential. Followed by Freshwater Aquatic Ecotoxicity Potential, with the contribution proportion of 18.68%. The rice planting stage is the main steps of an impact on the environment, with the contribution proportion of 88.4%. Improving the way of irrigation, regulating fertilizers and pesticides can diminish the environmental impact of the whole system.
Published in | Science Discovery (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16 |
Page(s) | 276-282 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Rice, Life Cycle Assessment, GaBi6.0 Software, Environmental Impact
[1] | 崔雯雯.基于图像处理的大米品质检测系统研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2015。 |
[2] | 中国统计出版社,中国统计年鉴[M], 2016。 |
[3] | 于瑾泉,张芸,张树深,等.啤酒的生命周期评价[J].环境科学学报,2015, (04):1217-1223。 |
[4] | Kwofie E. M, Ngadi M. A. comparative lifecycle assessment of rural parboiling system and an integrated steaming and drying system fired with rice husk[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140: 622-630. |
[5] | Roy P, Ijiri T, Nei D, et al. Life cycle inventory (LCI) of different forms of rice consumed in households in Japan[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2009, 91(1): 49-55. |
[6] | Frischknecht R, Fantke P, et al. Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21(3): 429-442. |
[7] | 林涛.大米加工节能降耗技术的研究[J].粮食与食品工业,2015, (04):42-43+49。 |
[8] | 余红.可再生能源发电对PM_(10)和PM_(2.5)减排的贡献核算[J].环境工程技术学报,2014, (04):321-325。 |
[9] | 于跃龙,于丽伟,吕淑华.利用碎米加工大米粉的生产工艺研究[J].黑龙江粮油科技,1998, (01):54-55。 |
[10] | 邓南圣,王小兵.生命周期评价[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2013:107-108。 |
[11] | 梁龙,陈源泉,高旺盛.两种水稻生产方式的生命周期环境影响评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2009, (09):1992-1996。 |
[12] | 王明新,夏训峰,刘建国,柴育红,雷春生.太湖地区高产水稻生命周期评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2009, (02):420-424。 |
[13] | Coltro L, Marton L. F. M, Pilecco F. P, et al. Environmental profile of rice production in Southern Brazil: A. comparison between irrigated and subsurface drip irrigated cropping systems [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. |
[14] | 朱金伟,张凡,王洪昌,王凡,束韫.燃煤烟气脱硫脱硝技术的发展趋势[J].环境工程技术学报,2015, (03):200-204。 |
APA Style
Liting Ge, Qingxin Fan, Yang Song. (2017). Study of Rice Processing System Life Cycle. Science Discovery, 5(4), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16
ACS Style
Liting Ge; Qingxin Fan; Yang Song. Study of Rice Processing System Life Cycle. Sci. Discov. 2017, 5(4), 276-282. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16
AMA Style
Liting Ge, Qingxin Fan, Yang Song. Study of Rice Processing System Life Cycle. Sci Discov. 2017;5(4):276-282. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16
@article{10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16, author = {Liting Ge and Qingxin Fan and Yang Song}, title = {Study of Rice Processing System Life Cycle}, journal = {Science Discovery}, volume = {5}, number = {4}, pages = {276-282}, doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20170504.16}, abstract = {This study attempts to evaluate the environmental impact of rice processing system (raw materials acquisition, paddy processing, packaging, transportation and by-product recycle) with the application of GaBi6.0 software and CML2001-Jan.2016 model, primary data were collected from an agricultural group in the northeast China. The results that the life cycle total environmental impact is 4.35×10-6, and Global Warming Potential causes the largest damage on environment with the contribution of 66.58% of the total environmental impact potential. Followed by Freshwater Aquatic Ecotoxicity Potential, with the contribution proportion of 18.68%. The rice planting stage is the main steps of an impact on the environment, with the contribution proportion of 88.4%. Improving the way of irrigation, regulating fertilizers and pesticides can diminish the environmental impact of the whole system.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Study of Rice Processing System Life Cycle AU - Liting Ge AU - Qingxin Fan AU - Yang Song Y1 - 2017/06/06 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16 DO - 10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16 T2 - Science Discovery JF - Science Discovery JO - Science Discovery SP - 276 EP - 282 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0650 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20170504.16 AB - This study attempts to evaluate the environmental impact of rice processing system (raw materials acquisition, paddy processing, packaging, transportation and by-product recycle) with the application of GaBi6.0 software and CML2001-Jan.2016 model, primary data were collected from an agricultural group in the northeast China. The results that the life cycle total environmental impact is 4.35×10-6, and Global Warming Potential causes the largest damage on environment with the contribution of 66.58% of the total environmental impact potential. Followed by Freshwater Aquatic Ecotoxicity Potential, with the contribution proportion of 18.68%. The rice planting stage is the main steps of an impact on the environment, with the contribution proportion of 88.4%. Improving the way of irrigation, regulating fertilizers and pesticides can diminish the environmental impact of the whole system. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -