Background and Objective: Aberegelle goat was small in body size and highly resistant to the harsh environment in the low land of Wag-himra. The objective of the study was to conserve the indigenous Abergelle goat and improve growth and milk production traits through selective breeding. Materials and Methods: The selection of bucks was done once a year using indexed estimated breeding value of yearling weight and their respective dam milk yield performances. A total of 469 for body weight and 345 for milk yield records were used for performance evaluation Top-ranked bucks selected from the flock were used as replacements at the nucleus while the surplus bucks were disseminated to nearby villages. The general linear model procedure of SAS software (version 9.0) was employed to evaluate the body weight and milk yield of the breed during the last five years (2016-2020). Results: The overall birth-, three-month-, six-month-, nine-month- and yearling weights were 1.98, 6.5, 8.6, 11.4, and 13.8 kg, respectively. The overall lactation milk yield, average daily milk yield, and lactation length were 17.64 kg, 0.30 kg, and 8.45 weeks, respectively. Within the last five consecutive selections years’ birth weight has increased from 1.64±0.04 to 2.3±0.02 kg, weaning weight from 5.6±0.25 to 7.5±0.15kg, and yearling weight from 13±0.43 to 15.2±0.27kg. Conclusion: Wet season birth was important for increasing milk production and lactation length. Nucleus flocks in the station the growth traits and milk traits can be improved by selection and selection at the station once a year. The Selection of breeding bucks should be at the age of six months and nine months before the breeding bucks went market for sale.
Published in | American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12 |
Page(s) | 93-98 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Abergelle Goat, Breeding, Milk Production, Dissemination, Partial Open, Selection
[1] | Abraham Hagos et al., 21, June (2018) Tropical Animal Health and Production (2018) 50: 1887–1892 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1640-5 |
[2] | Abegaz, S., Sölkner, J., Gizaw, S., Dessie, T., Haile, A., Mirkena, T., Wurzinger, M. (2014). Optimizing alternative schemes of community-based breeding programs for two Ethiopian goat breeds. 18, 47–55. |
[3] | Abegaz, S., Sölkner, J., Gizaw, S., Dessie, T., Haile, A., & Wurzinger, M. (2013). Description of production systems and morphological characteristics of Abergelle and Western lowland goat breeds in Ethiopia: implication for community-based breeding programmes. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources Génétiques Animales/Recursos Genéticos Animales, 53, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2078633613000088 |
[4] | Abegaz, S., Wyk, J. B. V. A. N., & Olivier, J. J. (2010). Archives Animal, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-53-85-2010 Breeding Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters of growth curve and their relationship with early growth and productivity in Horro sheep. 53, 85–94. |
[5] | Ahmed Seid. (2017). Breeding Practices and Strategies for Genetic Improvement of Indigenous Goats in Ethiopia . Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(4), 90–96. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2017.4.051817064 |
[6] | Alade, N. K., Dilala, M. A. & Abdulyekeen, A. O. (2010). Phenotypic and Genetic Parameter Estimates of Litter Size and Body Weights in Goats. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). |
[7] | Amare, B., Gobeze, M., & Wondim, B. (2020). Implementation of community based breeding program to improve growth rate and milk. (September). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.51227/ojafr.2020.28 |
[8] | Banerjee, A. K., Animut, G., & Ermias, E. (1995). Selection and Breeding Strategies for Increased Productivity of. The Opportunities and Challenges of Enhancing Goat Production in East Africa, (Table 1), 70–79. |
[9] | Bett, R. C., Kosgey, I. S., Kahi, A. K., & Peters, K. J. (2009). Realities in breed improvement programmes for dairy goats in East and Central Africa. Small Ruminant Research, 85(2–3), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.08.001 |
[10] | Deribe, B., & Taye, M. (2013). Growth performance and carcass characteristics of central highland goats in Sekota District, Ethiopia. Agricultural Advances, 2(8), 250–258. doi: 10.14196/aa.v2i8.902. |
[11] | Deribe, G., Abebe, G., & Tegegne, A. (2014). Non-genetic factors influencing reproductive traits and preweaning mortality of lambs and kids under smallholder management, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24(2), 413–417. |
[12] | Dhaba Urgessa, Belay Duguma, S. D. and T. T. (2012). Sheep and Goat Production Systems in Ilu Abba Bora Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia : Feeding and Management Strategies Illu Abba Bora Zone Office of Agriculture and Rural Development, Mettu, Ethiopia,. Global Veterinaria, 9(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.gv.2012.9.4.64162 |
[13] | FAOSTAT. (2020). Data. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data accessed on 20 December 2021. |
[14] | (CSA). (2017). Agricultural sample survey 2016/17 [2009 e.c.]: livestock and livestock characteristics. II (April), 230. Retrieved from http://www.csa.gov.et/ |
[15] | Gardner, D. S., Buttery, P. J., & Symonds, M. E. (2007). Factors affecting birth weight in sheep: Maternal environment. (May 2014). https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0042 |
[16] | Gizaw, S., Komen, H., & van Arendonk, J. A. M. (2010). Participatory definition of breeding objectives and selection indexes for sheep breeding in traditional systems. Livestock Science, 128(1–3), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.016 |
[17] | Girum Gebreyesus, A. H. and T. D. (2012). Participatory characterization of the Short-eared Somali goat and its production environment around Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 24(10). |
[18] | Jembere, T., Dessie, T., Rischkowsky, B., Kebede, K., Mwai, A. Okeyo, Haile, A. (2015). Meta-analysis of average estimates of genetic parameters for growth, reproduction and milk production traits in goats. Small Ruminant Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.04.024 |
[19] | Jembere Temesgen. (2016). Genetic parameters, productivity indices and breeding plans for designing community-based goat breeding programs in Ethiopia. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/78239. |
[20] | Solomon Gizaw, B. Rischkowsky, A. Valle-Zarate, A. Haile, J. A. M. van Arendonk, A. O. M. & T. D. (2014). Breeding programs for smallholder sheep farming systems: I. Evaluation of alternative designs of breeding schemes. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 131, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12101 |
[21] | Tadesse, D., Urge, M., Animut, G., & Mekasha, Y. (2016). Growth and carcass characteristics of three Ethiopian indigenous goats fed concentrate at different supplementation levels. SpringerPlus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2055-2 |
[22] | Yemane et al., 2022), January 2022, International Journal of Livestock Research: DOI: 10.5455/ijlr.20210613023030. |
APA Style
Walle, Y. A., Gobeze, M. A., Wondim, B. W., Aklog, W. K., Bahiru, A. W., et al. (2023). Selection Response on Growth and Milk Production Performance of Abergelle Goat Managed Under Station Condition in Wag-Himra, Ethiopia. American Journal of Life Sciences, 11(6), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12
ACS Style
Walle, Y. A.; Gobeze, M. A.; Wondim, B. W.; Aklog, W. K.; Bahiru, A. W., et al. Selection Response on Growth and Milk Production Performance of Abergelle Goat Managed Under Station Condition in Wag-Himra, Ethiopia. Am. J. Life Sci. 2023, 11(6), 93-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12
AMA Style
Walle YA, Gobeze MA, Wondim BW, Aklog WK, Bahiru AW, et al. Selection Response on Growth and Milk Production Performance of Abergelle Goat Managed Under Station Condition in Wag-Himra, Ethiopia. Am J Life Sci. 2023;11(6):93-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12, author = {Yeshiwas Abebe Walle and Mulatu Alamirew Gobeze and Bekahagn Wondim Wondim and Wubneh Kibert Aklog and Adane Woreta Bahiru and Alemu Demilie Demlie and Tigabu Limenh Limenh}, title = {Selection Response on Growth and Milk Production Performance of Abergelle Goat Managed Under Station Condition in Wag-Himra, Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences}, volume = {11}, number = {6}, pages = {93-98}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20231106.12}, abstract = {Background and Objective: Aberegelle goat was small in body size and highly resistant to the harsh environment in the low land of Wag-himra. The objective of the study was to conserve the indigenous Abergelle goat and improve growth and milk production traits through selective breeding. Materials and Methods: The selection of bucks was done once a year using indexed estimated breeding value of yearling weight and their respective dam milk yield performances. A total of 469 for body weight and 345 for milk yield records were used for performance evaluation Top-ranked bucks selected from the flock were used as replacements at the nucleus while the surplus bucks were disseminated to nearby villages. The general linear model procedure of SAS software (version 9.0) was employed to evaluate the body weight and milk yield of the breed during the last five years (2016-2020). Results: The overall birth-, three-month-, six-month-, nine-month- and yearling weights were 1.98, 6.5, 8.6, 11.4, and 13.8 kg, respectively. The overall lactation milk yield, average daily milk yield, and lactation length were 17.64 kg, 0.30 kg, and 8.45 weeks, respectively. Within the last five consecutive selections years’ birth weight has increased from 1.64±0.04 to 2.3±0.02 kg, weaning weight from 5.6±0.25 to 7.5±0.15kg, and yearling weight from 13±0.43 to 15.2±0.27kg. Conclusion: Wet season birth was important for increasing milk production and lactation length. Nucleus flocks in the station the growth traits and milk traits can be improved by selection and selection at the station once a year. The Selection of breeding bucks should be at the age of six months and nine months before the breeding bucks went market for sale. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Selection Response on Growth and Milk Production Performance of Abergelle Goat Managed Under Station Condition in Wag-Himra, Ethiopia AU - Yeshiwas Abebe Walle AU - Mulatu Alamirew Gobeze AU - Bekahagn Wondim Wondim AU - Wubneh Kibert Aklog AU - Adane Woreta Bahiru AU - Alemu Demilie Demlie AU - Tigabu Limenh Limenh Y1 - 2023/12/22 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12 T2 - American Journal of Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Life Sciences SP - 93 EP - 98 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231106.12 AB - Background and Objective: Aberegelle goat was small in body size and highly resistant to the harsh environment in the low land of Wag-himra. The objective of the study was to conserve the indigenous Abergelle goat and improve growth and milk production traits through selective breeding. Materials and Methods: The selection of bucks was done once a year using indexed estimated breeding value of yearling weight and their respective dam milk yield performances. A total of 469 for body weight and 345 for milk yield records were used for performance evaluation Top-ranked bucks selected from the flock were used as replacements at the nucleus while the surplus bucks were disseminated to nearby villages. The general linear model procedure of SAS software (version 9.0) was employed to evaluate the body weight and milk yield of the breed during the last five years (2016-2020). Results: The overall birth-, three-month-, six-month-, nine-month- and yearling weights were 1.98, 6.5, 8.6, 11.4, and 13.8 kg, respectively. The overall lactation milk yield, average daily milk yield, and lactation length were 17.64 kg, 0.30 kg, and 8.45 weeks, respectively. Within the last five consecutive selections years’ birth weight has increased from 1.64±0.04 to 2.3±0.02 kg, weaning weight from 5.6±0.25 to 7.5±0.15kg, and yearling weight from 13±0.43 to 15.2±0.27kg. Conclusion: Wet season birth was important for increasing milk production and lactation length. Nucleus flocks in the station the growth traits and milk traits can be improved by selection and selection at the station once a year. The Selection of breeding bucks should be at the age of six months and nine months before the breeding bucks went market for sale. VL - 11 IS - 6 ER -